Assistance animal practice may involve the use of a range of chemicals and substances that support workplace operations, infection control, animal care, environmental management and personal safety.
While many of these substances are commonly used and considered low risk when managed appropriately, they can create hazards if they are incorrectly stored, handled, applied or disposed of.
Examples of hazardous chemicals and substances that may be encountered within assistance animal settings include:
Occupational Therapists working within assistance animal practice must understand that chemical safety is part of broader WHS risk management.
The presence of an assistance animal does not remove workplace chemical risks, and chemical management procedures must consider the safety of:
A hazardous chemical is a substance that has the potential to cause harm to people, animals or the environment.
Harm may occur through:
The level of risk depends on factors including:
A product being commonly available does not automatically mean it is risk-free.
Many household and workplace products can create hazards if used incorrectly.
Assistance animal workplaces have unique considerations because chemicals may affect both humans and animals.
Animals may have increased exposure risk because they:
Examples include:
A disinfectant used on a training floor may create risk if an animal enters the area before the product has dried.
A grooming product may create irritation if incorrectly selected or applied.
A cleaning chemical may create respiratory concerns in poorly ventilated areas.
A parasite treatment product may create risk if incorrectly dosed or applied.
Chemical safety therefore requires consideration of both human and animal wellbeing.
Workplaces using hazardous chemicals must maintain access to current Safety Data Sheets (SDS).
An SDS provides important information including:
Workers should know:
OTs involved in workplace assessments or recommendations should consider whether appropriate chemical safety information is available when reviewing environments.
Hazardous chemicals should be stored according to manufacturer instructions and workplace procedures.
Storage considerations include:
Chemicals should never be transferred into unlabelled containers.
For example, placing cleaning chemicals into drink bottles or food containers creates significant risk of accidental ingestion.
All chemical products should be clearly identifiable.
Labels should include relevant information such as:
Incorrectly labelled products can result in:
Clear identification supports safer decision-making.
PPE is one component of chemical risk management.
Appropriate PPE depends on the hazard and may include:
PPE selection should be based on:
PPE should not be viewed as the only control measure.
Where possible, risks should first be reduced through safer systems and practices.
Chemical risks should be managed using the hierarchy of controls.
Remove unnecessary chemical use where possible.
Example:
Using a lower-risk cleaning method where appropriate.
Replace a hazardous product with a safer alternative.
Example:
Selecting a less irritating cleaning product that still meets hygiene requirements.
Modify the environment to reduce exposure.
Examples:
Use procedures and systems to reduce risk.
Examples:
Use PPE where other controls cannot completely remove risk.
When chemicals are used in environments where assistance animals are present, consideration should be given to:
Animals should not be exposed unnecessarily to chemicals simply because they are present in a workplace environment.
Safe systems should consider:
Some substances that appear low risk may still require consideration.
Examples include:
Consideration should be given to:
Handlers and workers should follow appropriate hygiene practices and manufacturer guidance.
Workplaces should have procedures for responding to chemical incidents.
These should address:
Examples include:
Workers should know who to notify and what actions are required.
Workers using hazardous chemicals require appropriate information and training.
Training should include:
Training should be appropriate to the person’s role.
A worker responsible for cleaning tasks may require more detailed chemical training than a person working in administration.
OTs may not directly manage all workplace chemical systems; however, they should recognise chemical safety as part of holistic environmental assessment.
When considering assistance animal environments, OTs should consider:
For example:
An OT recommending an assistance animal workplace arrangement should consider whether cleaning practices, animal access areas and hygiene procedures support safe participation.
Chemical safety is an essential component of safe assistance animal practice.
Effective hazardous chemical management protects:
Safe practice requires more than simply having chemicals available.
It requires:
Occupational Therapists contribute to safer assistance animal environments by recognising that workplace safety includes every factor that influences the wellbeing of people and animals within the environment.