Occupational therapy is founded on the understanding that people are occupational beings whose identities, wellbeing and participation are shaped through engagement in meaningful activities, roles and relationships. Within assistance animal assessment, understanding the person’s occupational narrative is essential because an assistance animal is not simply introduced to address a diagnosis, impairment or isolated task limitation. It is introduced into a person’s life.
An occupational narrative explores the story of who a person is, what matters to them, how they participate in daily life, what has changed due to disability, and what future participation they wish to achieve.
For occupational therapists assessing assistance animals, the question is not only:
“What can an assistance animal do?”
but:
“What life participation opportunities, roles and occupations could this partnership support?”
This distinction ensures that assistance animal recommendations remain grounded in occupational therapy principles rather than focusing only on impairment reduction or task performance.
A comprehensive occupational narrative allows the occupational therapist to understand:
This information provides the foundation for determining whether an assistance animal aligns with the person’s occupational needs.
For example, two people may both experience difficulty leaving the home due to disability-related barriers.
However, their occupational narratives may be very different.
One person may identify returning to university attendance as their primary goal.
Another may prioritise reconnecting with family, participating in community activities or independently accessing healthcare.
Although the functional barrier may appear similar, the occupational goals and therefore the potential role of an assistance animal may differ substantially.
A purely deficit-focused assessment may ask:
While understanding functional limitations is important, occupational therapy requires a broader perspective.
An occupational narrative also asks:
This approach aligns with contemporary disability practice by recognising people as whole individuals rather than collections of diagnoses or impairments.
Disability may affect more than physical ability or task completion.
It may influence:
For some individuals, the greatest impact of disability is not the inability to complete a specific activity, but the loss of valued life roles.
An assistance animal may therefore be considered not only for task assistance, but for its potential contribution to rebuilding participation and enabling meaningful engagement.
However, occupational therapists must avoid assuming that an assistance animal will automatically restore lost roles.
The assessment must consider whether:
Occupational identity refers to how people understand themselves through their participation in meaningful occupations and roles.
Disability, injury or illness may affect occupational identity by changing how a person sees themselves and how they engage with the world.
An assistance animal may become part of a person’s occupational identity by supporting:
However, occupational therapists must recognise that the assistance animal should support the person’s identity rather than replace it.
The goal is not for the person to become “an assistance dog handler”.
The goal is for the person to participate more fully in the occupations and roles that matter to them.
Assistance animal outcomes should ultimately be considered through the lens of participation.
Participation-focused assessment considers whether the partnership supports meaningful changes such as:
A task performed by an animal is not automatically meaningful unless it contributes to improved occupational participation.
For example:
A dog may be trained to interrupt a behaviour.
However, the occupational question is:
“Does this interruption enable the person to participate more successfully in meaningful occupations?”
The value of the task lies in its relationship to participation outcomes.
The occupational therapist is responsible for gathering and synthesising information from multiple sources, including:
The OT should avoid allowing external expectations to define the occupational narrative.
For example:
However, the OT must determine whether the intervention aligns with the person’s occupational needs and goals.
A strong assistance animal recommendation should demonstrate a clear connection between:
Person’s occupational narrative
↓
Identified participation barriers
↓
Functional needs
↓
Assistance animal role
↓
Expected occupational outcomes
Without this connection, recommendations risk becoming task-focused rather than occupation-focused.
Two individuals request assistance dogs due to difficulty accessing community environments.
Identifies their primary goal as returning to university and independently navigating campus environments.
Assessment identifies that trained assistance animal tasks may support confidence, regulation and environmental navigation.
Identifies their primary goal as reducing loneliness and having companionship.
Assessment identifies significant benefit from animal interaction but limited evidence that a trained assistance animal is required.
Although both individuals value animals, their occupational narratives result in different clinical reasoning outcomes.
Occupational therapists should consider:
The intervention must fit the person’s life.
Tasks only have meaning when connected to participation.
Assessment must consider the whole person.
Not simply task completion.
The animal is a means to support occupational engagement, not the end goal.
Occupational narrative provides the foundation for person-centred assistance animal assessment by connecting functional needs with meaningful life participation. At AQF 9 level, occupational therapists must demonstrate the ability to analyse how disability affects occupational identity, roles and participation, and determine whether an assistance animal represents an appropriate and sustainable intervention within the person’s broader life context.