The final stage of the AAOT Credential focuses on professional integration, critical reflection and recognition of your development across the credential.
Although the final Professional Reflection is completed near the end of AAOT, one important part begins now.
Before progressing into the substantive AAOT curriculum, you will create a record of the practitioner you are today.
At the end of the credential, you will return to that record and compare your starting point with the knowledge, professional reasoning, skills, networks, perspectives and areas of uncertainty you have developed throughout AAOT.
The purpose is not simply to demonstrate that you know more information.
Advanced professional development should also influence how you:
Your final Professional Reflection will draw upon learning and evidence from across the entire AAOT Credential, including your assessments, Professional Portfolio, Capstone work, interdisciplinary engagement, additional learning and your original Starting Point Reflection.
Before beginning the substantive AAOT learning material, complete a Starting Point Reflection.
This activity captures an authentic snapshot of your current:
There are no correct answers.
The Starting Point Reflection is not marked, graded or assessed.
You will not be disadvantaged because you identify gaps in your knowledge.
In fact, recognising what you do not know is an important professional capability.
Every participant enters AAOT from a different starting point. Although participants are Occupational Therapists, their professional experience, areas of practice, animal knowledge, research experience, lived experience, previous professional development and professional networks will differ.
That variation is expected.
The purpose is to document your own starting point so that you can meaningfully examine your development later.
Complete the Starting Point Reflection before undertaking substantive AAOT learning.
Do not research assistance-animal topics first so that your answers appear more knowledgeable.
Do not read ahead and then return to improve your starting position.
We are not looking for the “right” answers.
We want an authentic record of:
What do I know now?
What do I think I know?
What don’t I know?
What do I want to know?
What can I currently do?
What would I like to be able to do by the end of AAOT?
The distinction between what you know and what you think you know is deliberate. Professional education may confirm existing knowledge, but it may also reveal that something you previously believed was incomplete, outdated, based largely upon convention or considerably more complex than you realised.
There is no mandatory structure.
Your Starting Point Reflection simply needs to contain enough information for your future self to meaningfully compare where you began with where you finish.
You may wish to consider your current understanding of areas such as:
You do not need to address every topic.
This is a snapshot, not an examination.
Consider some of the assumptions you are bringing into AAOT.
For example:
Your current knowledge might have developed through:
You are not required to academically reference your Starting Point Reflection.
The purpose is to record what you currently think, not what you can establish through a literature search.
Be equally open about the limits of your present knowledge.
Consider:
There is value in being able to say:
I don’t know.
By the end of AAOT, you may know the answer.
Alternatively, you may still not know the answer—but may be far better able to determine:
That is also professional development.
Consider why you enrolled in AAOT.
Ask yourself:
You may find it useful to create a section titled:
Your questions might be broad:
How should an Occupational Therapist determine whether an assistance animal is an appropriate intervention?
Or highly specific:
What should I do if I believe an assistance animal is benefiting the person but the animal’s welfare may be compromised?
Record as many questions as are useful.
At the end of AAOT, you may discover that some were answered, some changed completely and others led to entirely new questions.
You are not entering AAOT as a blank slate.
Document some of the strengths, knowledge and experience you already bring.
This might include experience in:
Also identify areas in which you would particularly like to develop.
This is not a comparison between participants.
Someone entering AAOT with substantial animal-training experience and someone with limited animal-training experience will begin with different knowledge.
Likewise, Occupational Therapists working in mental health, paediatrics, rehabilitation, community practice or other settings will bring different professional strengths.
What matters is your development from your own starting point.
One way to complete the Starting Point Reflection is to write a letter to the practitioner you expect to become.
For example:
Dear future me,
Right now, this is what I understand about assistance animals…
This is what I think the role of an AAOT should be…
These are the things I feel confident about…
These are the things I know very little about…
These are the assumptions I am bringing into the credential…
These are the questions I hope I can answer…
These are the skills I hope to develop…
This is what I hope I will be able to do differently when I read this again…
And this is the kind of practitioner I hope to become…
You do not need to use this format.
It is simply one option.
Because the Starting Point Reflection is not assessed, there is no mandatory word count.
As a guide, approximately 1,000–1,500 words, or an equivalent amount of meaningful content in another format, should provide a useful baseline.
You might create:
Do not spend unnecessary time polishing it.
It does not require a formal academic introduction or conclusion.
APA 7 referencing is not required unless you independently choose to discuss particular sources.
Authenticity is more useful here than academic polish.
Your Starting Point Reflection can remain private.
You do not need to submit it to WAFA.
You might:
Whatever method you choose, make sure you will be able to locate it later.
If WAFA offers an optional safekeeping process, you may also use that process.
Providing a copy to WAFA for safekeeping does not turn the Starting Point Reflection into an assessment.
Once you have completed your Starting Point Reflection, leave it as it is.
Later, you may read something you wrote and realise that it was incorrect.
You may discover that something you considered simple is considerably more complex.
You may realise that an issue you initially thought sat within your competence actually requires interdisciplinary input.
You may discover that something you once found difficult now seems straightforward.
You may also discover that your original position remains defensible—but that you can now explain it much more clearly, support it with evidence and recognise its limitations.
Do not go back and “fix” the original reflection.
Those differences are precisely what make it valuable.
Your Starting Point Reflection is not expected to demonstrate the graduate standard.
It records the point from which your development began.
You do not need to create a separate second reflective portfolio for this assessment.
Your existing AAOT Professional Portfolio and Capstone Portfolio should provide much of the evidence you may later draw upon.
As you progress, retain meaningful evidence of development in accordance with those portfolio requirements.
Examples may include:
Learning outside formal AAOT activities may also be relevant.
Your professional development is not limited to material provided directly by WAFA.
Once you have completed the substantive AAOT curriculum and Capstone, return to this topic.
Retrieve your Starting Point Reflection.
Read it, watch it or listen to it.
Then ask:
Who was the practitioner who began AAOT—and who is the practitioner completing it?
The purpose is not to criticise your earlier self.
Use the Starting Point Reflection as evidence against which you can examine your professional development.
The Professional Integration and Reflection is the final reflective assessment of the AAOT Credential.
Unlike the Starting Point Reflection, this submission is assessed.
It should demonstrate the advanced critical thinking, integration, evidence-informed reasoning and professional reflection expected of an AAOT graduate.
For a conventional written submission, approximately 3,000–4,000 words is a reasonable guide.
Where the learning outcomes permit, an appropriate alternative format may be considered in accordance with How Assessment and Competency Work in AAOT.
The assessment method may vary where appropriate.
The required professional standard does not.
Your final assessment must meaningfully engage with your Starting Point Reflection.
You do not have to submit the original reflection itself.
For example, you might write:
When I completed my Starting Point Reflection, I identified animal learning theory as one of my major knowledge gaps. I understood basic reinforcement terminology but had limited confidence critically evaluating different training approaches. During AAOT…
You can therefore use your Starting Point Reflection as comparative evidence without providing the original document.
If you are comfortable doing so, you may include the original reflection as:
Appendix A — Starting Point Reflection
This is optional.
The original Starting Point Reflection will not be retrospectively graded.
If you include it, provide the original rather than an improved version.
You may redact personal or sensitive information before submission.
Choosing not to provide the original will not disadvantage your assessment.
Your final assessment should consider your development across the whole credential rather than summarising each unit sequentially.
Useful areas of analysis include:
What do you understand now that you did not understand when you began?
What knowledge was confirmed, extended, challenged or replaced?
Has the way you question claims and assumptions changed?
Are you more comfortable recognising uncertainty or competing interpretations?
Has the way you search for, evaluate, compare and apply evidence developed?
Are you better able to distinguish strong evidence from weak evidence, professional opinion, industry convention and unsupported claims?
Do you approach complex assistance-animal situations differently?
Do you ask different questions?
Do you recognise information that you might previously have overlooked?
Has your understanding of occupational therapy’s contribution to assistance-animal practice changed?
Are you clearer about what makes the OT perspective distinctive?
Has your understanding of the needs of both members of an assistance-animal team become more sophisticated?
How do you now consider animal behaviour, health, learning, welfare, suitability, workload and quality of life alongside the person’s occupational needs, autonomy and participation?
Have your ethical perspectives changed or become more nuanced?
Are you better able to identify competing interests, uncertainty and ethically difficult decisions?
Has your understanding of legislation, rights, public access, risk, documentation and professional accountability changed?
Are you better able to distinguish:
What have you learned from other professions?
How has your professional network developed?
Who can you now consult when a matter sits outside your expertise?
What did learning beyond occupational therapy contribute to your development?
What did you learn about critically engaging with unfamiliar disciplines?
What did developing a contribution for the assistance-animal field teach you about professional responsibility, accessibility, advocacy, leadership, evidence translation or sector development?
What did your integrated AAOT case reveal about your ability to bring together:
Which feedback had the greatest influence on your development?
Did you ever disagree with feedback?
How did you determine whether to accept, adapt or reject it?
What kind of AAOT practitioner are you becoming?
What strengths do you bring?
What limitations do you recognise?
What principles do you want to characterise your future practice?
The final reflection should demonstrate development rather than simply state that development occurred.
Instead of:
I am much better at critical appraisal.
show how your reasoning changed.
For example, you might compare an early piece of work in which you largely accepted a study’s conclusion with later work in which you considered:
Instead of:
I understand animal welfare much better.
you might explain that your original understanding focused primarily on preventing harm, whereas your current reasoning also considers:
Your evidence might come from:
The current draft’s “show us, don’t just tell us” distinction is particularly worth retaining because it turns reflection into evidence of development rather than unsupported self-description.
AAOT does not expect you to finish believing that you know everything about assistance animals.
Advanced professional education may sometimes make you less certain, not more.
You may begin with:
The answer is obviously X.
and finish with:
It depends. I need to know A, B and C, examine the available evidence, consider the person’s circumstances, assess relevant animal-welfare implications, consult the appropriate profession and consider the competing risks before I can make that recommendation.
That is not loss of knowledge.
It is development of more sophisticated professional reasoning.
Likewise, being able to say:
This is outside my expertise. I need another professional.
may demonstrate stronger professional judgement than attempting to provide an answer yourself.
The existing draft articulates this progression very effectively.
Professional reflection should not only look backwards.
Consider:
Completion of AAOT does not represent the end of professional learning.
It should provide a stronger foundation from which that learning continues.
Your final Professional Integration and Reflection should provide evidence that you can:
The aim is not perfection.
It is to demonstrate meaningful professional development and readiness to carry that learning forward into AAOT practice.
Most of this topic will become relevant again near the end of AAOT.
For now:
At the end of the credential, you will return to it.
You will then be able to compare the practitioner who began AAOT with the practitioner who is preparing to complete it.