One of the most important skills for anyone working with animals is understanding how animals are classified. Scientific classification, known as taxonomy, provides a universal system for identifying and naming organisms. It allows veterinarians, researchers, trainers, conservationists and governments around the world to communicate about animals accurately, regardless of language or local common names.
Understanding taxonomy also helps assistance animal professionals recognise differences between species, appreciate why different species have different welfare and training requirements, and avoid relying solely on common names or appearance when identifying an animal.
Taxonomy is the scientific discipline of identifying, naming and classifying living organisms based on their evolutionary relationships and shared characteristics.
Modern taxonomy considers multiple sources of evidence, including:
As scientific knowledge improves, taxonomic classifications may change. Species may be split into several species, combined, or reclassified as new genetic evidence becomes available.
Living organisms are classified into increasingly specific groups.
| Taxonomic Rank | Example (Domestic Dog) |
|---|---|
| Domain | Eukaryota |
| Kingdom | Animalia |
| Phylum | Chordata |
| Class | Mammalia |
| Order | Carnivora |
| Family | Canidae |
| Genus | Canis |
| Species | Canis lupus |
| Subspecies | Canis lupus familiaris |
Each level becomes progressively more specific.
For example:
Scientific names are written using binomial (or trinomial for subspecies) nomenclature:
For example:
Canis lupus familiaris
Animals are commonly divided into two broad groups based on whether they possess a backbone (vertebral column).
Vertebrates possess an internal skeleton and backbone. They generally have a well-developed brain enclosed within a skull and complex organ systems. Vertebrates include mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians and fish.
Invertebrates lack a backbone and account for approximately 95% of all known animal species. Many possess an external skeleton (exoskeleton), while others have soft bodies supported by fluid or connective tissue. Invertebrates include insects, spiders, crustaceans, molluscs, worms, jellyfish, corals and starfish.
Although invertebrates represent the overwhelming majority of animal diversity, vertebrates include many of the species most commonly encountered in veterinary medicine, animal training, conservation and assistance animal practice.
All vertebrates belong to one of five major classes.
Mammals are characterised by hair or fur, mammary glands that produce milk, warm-blooded (endothermic) metabolism and three middle ear bones. Most mammals give birth to live young, although monotremes such as the platypus and echidnas lay eggs.
Examples include:
Birds possess feathers, beaks, wings and lay hard-shelled eggs. Like mammals, they are warm-blooded and have highly efficient respiratory systems.
Examples include:
Reptiles generally possess dry scales, breathe using lungs and are ectothermic (“cold-blooded”), relying largely on environmental temperatures to regulate body temperature.
Examples include:
Amphibians typically begin life in water before undergoing metamorphosis into an adult form. Their skin is usually moist and permeable, making them highly sensitive to environmental changes.
Examples include:
Fish are aquatic vertebrates that breathe primarily using gills throughout life. Most possess fins and scales, although considerable diversity exists between species.
Examples include:
Each vertebrate class has evolved unique anatomical, physiological and behavioural adaptations. Understanding these differences is essential because species from different vertebrate classes have markedly different welfare, husbandry, training and veterinary requirements.
Common names can be confusing because they vary between countries, organisations and even regions.
For example:
all refer to the same species:
Puma concolor
Scientific names avoid this confusion by providing one internationally recognised name for each taxon.
Similarly, common names such as:
may refer to several different breeds or breed types, whereas scientific classification is precise.
One of the most widely taught concepts is the Biological Species Concept, proposed by Ernst Mayr.
Under this concept, a species consists of populations that naturally interbreed and produce fertile offspring while remaining reproductively isolated from other species.
For example:
Although the Biological Species Concept is extremely useful, it does not explain every situation. Some organisms reproduce asexually, some closely related species hybridise naturally, and some species remain genetically distinct despite occasional interbreeding.
For this reason, scientists also use additional approaches.
Although species are generally expected to reproduce only with members of their own species, nature is not always clear-cut. Some closely related species can occasionally interbreed, particularly when they have diverged relatively recently in evolutionary history.
One of the best-known examples is the lion (Panthera leo) and tiger (Panthera tigris). Although they belong to the same genus (Panthera), they are recognised as different species because they have distinct evolutionary histories, genetics, morphology, behaviour and natural geographic distributions.
Historically, lions occurred primarily throughout Africa, with a small remnant population in India, while tigers naturally occurred across much of Asia. Their natural geographic ranges do not overlap today, meaning they would not normally encounter one another or breed in the wild. Almost all documented lion–tiger hybrids have therefore been produced in captivity after humans intentionally housed the animals together.
These hybrids include:
Unlike horses and donkeys, whose hybrid offspring (mules) are usually sterile, some female ligers and tigons have produced offspring, although male hybrids are generally infertile. This demonstrates that reproductive compatibility exists to some degree between these closely related species.
If lions and tigers can produce offspring, why are they not considered the same species?
The ability to produce hybrid offspring is only one criterion used in modern taxonomy. Scientists also consider multiple other factors, including:
Lions and tigers have remained separate evolutionary lineages for hundreds of thousands of years, occupying different habitats and ecological niches with distinct behaviours and adaptations. Under modern species concepts, these differences are sufficient to recognise them as separate species despite their limited ability to hybridise under artificial conditions.
Hybridisation is not unique to lions and tigers. It also occurs naturally or occasionally between several closely related species, including wolves and coyotes, domestic dogs and wolves, and among numerous bird species. These examples demonstrate that species boundaries are sometimes more complex than a simple “can or cannot breed” definition, which is why modern taxonomy relies on multiple lines of evidence rather than reproductive compatibility alone.
This approach classifies species according to physical characteristics.
Scientists compare:
Historically, morphology formed the basis of most animal classification and remains important today.
Modern taxonomy increasingly relies on DNA.
Scientists compare:
DNA has greatly improved our understanding of evolutionary relationships and has resulted in many species being reclassified.
This approach classifies organisms according to their evolutionary history.
Scientists construct evolutionary trees showing how species are related through common ancestry.
This explains why animals may appear similar while being only distantly related, or appear different despite sharing a recent common ancestor.
Some species are distinguished by occupying different ecological niches.
Factors considered include:
A genus groups closely related species sharing a common evolutionary origin.
For example, the genus Canis includes:
These animals share many anatomical and genetic similarities.
Species represent the primary biological unit used to classify organisms.
Examples include:
| Common Name | Scientific Name |
|---|---|
| Grey Wolf | Canis lupus |
| Coyote | Canis latrans |
| Golden Jackal | Canis aureus |
| Red Fox | Vulpes vulpes |
| Domestic Cat | Felis catus |
| Lion | Panthera leo |
| Tiger | Panthera tigris |
Notice that lions and tigers belong to the same genus (Panthera) but are different species.
Likewise:
share the same genus but remain different species.
Subspecies are geographically or genetically distinct populations within the same species.
Subspecies are capable of interbreeding but possess consistent differences from other populations.
Examples include:
| Common Name | Scientific Name |
|---|---|
| Domestic Dog | Canis lupus familiaris |
| Dingo | Canis lupus dingo |
| Eurasian Wolf | Canis lupus lupus |
Scientists continue to debate the exact taxonomic status of dingoes, with some recognising them as a distinct species (Canis dingo) and others as a subspecies of the Grey Wolf. WAFA recognises that taxonomy is an evolving science and recommends using the classification adopted by the relevant jurisdiction or scientific authority where this distinction is important.
Subspecies recognise distinct populations within a species that have developed consistent genetic, physical, behavioural or geographic differences while remaining capable of interbreeding with other populations of the same species. They can be valuable for conservation, wildlife management, legal protection and scientific research because they acknowledge important biological diversity without classifying every population as a separate species.
For example, recognising the domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris) as distinct from the dingo (Canis lupus dingo) highlights their different evolutionary histories, behaviour, ecology and relationship with humans, despite their close genetic relationship.
However, subspecies are also one of the most debated areas of taxonomy. There is no universally accepted threshold for deciding when a population should be recognised as a subspecies rather than simple geographic variation or a separate species. Different taxonomists may classify the same population differently as new genetic, behavioural or ecological evidence becomes available.
Domestic dogs, wolves and dingoes provide an excellent example of why taxonomy matters.
All belong to:
Grey wolves and domestic dogs are generally considered the same species.
Modern domestic dogs are classified as:
Canis lupus familiaris
Many Australian scientists classify dingoes as:
Canis lupus dingo
although alternative classifications remain in use.
Despite sharing a species designation under many classification systems, important behavioural and ecological differences exist.
Compared with domestic dogs, dingoes generally display:
Taxonomy therefore tells us about evolutionary relationships, but it does not necessarily predict behaviour or suitability as an assistance animal.
Belonging to the same genus does not mean two animals are the same species.
Examples include:
These animals share common ancestry while remaining distinct species with different behaviours, ecology and welfare requirements.
Understanding taxonomy assists professionals to:
Taxonomy also helps avoid common misconceptions.
For example:
Assistance animal professionals should distinguish clearly between:
Accurate use of these terms promotes clear communication, improves record keeping and ensures that welfare, training and legal decisions are based on sound biological principles rather than common names or assumptions.