Goal setting is a central component of occupational therapy practice because it provides direction for intervention, supports shared decision-making and allows outcomes to be evaluated over time.
Within assistance animal practice, goals are particularly important because the intervention involves a significant long-term commitment between a person and a living animal.
A vague goal such as:
“I want an assistance dog to help me.”
does not provide enough information to determine:
Effective goal setting requires moving from general hopes towards clearly defined occupational outcomes.
The focus should always remain:
What meaningful change does this person want to achieve in their life?
rather than:
What tasks can we teach the animal?
Clear goals provide the foundation for:
Without clearly identified goals, assistance animal recommendations risk becoming based on:
A goal provides the link between:
Person → Occupational barrier → Assistance animal role → Outcome
People often begin with broad goals.
Examples:
“I want to be more independent.”
“I want to feel safer.”
“I want my child to cope better.”
“I want my dog to help me in public.”
These statements are meaningful but require further exploration.
The occupational therapist helps translate them into specific occupational outcomes.
For example:
“I want to be more independent.”
Independent doing what?
Possible areas:
“I want to independently complete my morning routine so I can attend work consistently.”
The assistance animal role can then be considered in relation to that outcome.
SMART goals provide a framework for developing goals that are:
The goal clearly identifies what occupation or participation outcome is being addressed.
Instead of:
“Improve confidence.”
Consider:
“Increase participation in community activities.”
The outcome should allow progress to be reviewed.
Measurement may include:
Goals should reflect realistic outcomes.
An assistance animal can provide meaningful support, but it cannot:
Goals must reflect what is realistically possible.
Goals should relate directly to what matters to the person.
A task may be technically possible but irrelevant if it does not improve meaningful participation.
Goals should include a timeframe for review.
This supports:
“I want my assistance dog because I cannot go out.”
The person wants to:
“Within six months, the person will increase participation in identified community activities using appropriate supports, including their assistance animal where clinically indicated.”
The focus is participation.
The dog is the intervention, not the goal.
“I need my dog for school.”
The goal may relate to:
“The student will increase participation in classroom routines by using identified supports that address disability-related barriers.”
The assistance animal is considered as one possible support.
“My dog helps me at home.”
The person wants to:
“The person will improve participation in identified daily living occupations through appropriate environmental and personal supports.”
A common mistake is writing goals around the animal rather than the person.
Examples of task statements:
“Dog will perform deep pressure.”
“Dog will retrieve objects.”
“Dog will interrupt behaviour.”
These are not occupational goals.
They are possible intervention strategies.
A more appropriate approach is:
“The person will improve participation in identified occupations through disability-related assistance provided by their trained assistance animal.”
Assistance animal practice requires realistic expectations.
Goals should avoid implying that an animal will:
For example:
Unrealistic goal:
“The dog will stop all anxiety episodes.”
More appropriate:
“The assistance animal will support the person to implement strategies that improve participation during identified situations.”
Because assistance animals are living beings, goals must also consider animal welfare.
A goal should not create unreasonable expectations for the animal.
Consider:
The best goals support both:
Occupational goals change.
A person’s:
may change over the lifespan of the partnership.
Therefore, goals should be reviewed regularly.
Questions include:
A successful partnership is not static.
It evolves with the person.
Goals should be developed collaboratively.
The person contributes:
The occupational therapist contributes:
The trainer contributes:
Together, the team determines realistic goals.
The purpose of the assistance animal is improved participation.
The person’s priorities guide goal development.
They are not the goal themselves.
Assistance animals provide support; they do not eliminate disability.
Progress should be reviewed over time.
A sustainable partnership benefits both members.
Assistance animal partnerships require ongoing review.
Effective goal setting ensures assistance animal recommendations remain grounded in occupational therapy principles. By focusing on meaningful, measurable human outcomes rather than simply listing animal tasks, occupational therapists support partnerships that are purposeful, sustainable and centred on genuine improvements in participation.