Self-advocacy is not only about knowing what you want to say.
It is also about having ways to communicate when you are tired, stressed, overwhelmed, non-speaking, under pressure or simply unable to find the right words in the moment.
Many assistance animal access problems happen unexpectedly.
You may be:
It is much easier to advocate effectively when you have prepared useful communication tools in advance.
These tools might be things you say, things you write, things you store on your phone, AAC messages, communication cards, support-person arrangements, or information resources you can hand to somebody else.
WAFA also provides free assistance animal information business cards that credential holders can order and carry with them. These are designed to help with brief public-access interactions by summarising key legal information, providing a QR code linking to the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth), and directing people to practical explanations, community-language translations and additional resources.
The goal is not to give you a script you must follow.
The goal is to help you develop your own communication toolkit, in formats that work for you.
People communicate in different ways.
You may prefer:
Your preferred communication method may also change depending on:
A person who communicates well in one setting may communicate very differently in another.
This is normal.
Self-advocacy is about finding the method that lets you communicate most effectively.
You cannot predict every access challenge.
But you can prepare for common ones.
Useful tools may include:
Preparation is particularly useful if you:
Preparation is not a sign that you are bad at advocacy.
It is good advocacy.
In Module 1, you began developing different ways of explaining your assistance animal partnership.
Now turn those explanations into practical communication tools.
Useful where little explanation is needed.
For example:
“This is my assistance animal.”
or:
“My dog is an assistance animal trained to assist me with my disability.”
The goal is to provide only enough information to clarify the situation.
Useful where additional information is relevant.
For example:
“My assistance animal is trained to assist with disability-related functional needs.”
or:
“My animal performs trained assistance that helps me manage the effects of my disability.”
You can make this more specific if you choose.
You do not need to provide your entire medical history.
Sometimes greater detail is appropriate.
For example:
A more detailed explanation may include:
The important point is that you decide which level is appropriate.
When challenged unexpectedly, many people provide too much information.
This can happen because they feel pressured to justify themselves.
For example:
“I have three diagnoses, and I was first diagnosed when I was seventeen, and then my specialist said…”
This may be more information than the situation requires.
A shorter response may be:
“This is my assistance animal. What information do you need in order to address the access issue?”
Short communication helps keep the interaction focused.
You do not always need to provide more information.
Sometimes you need to ask a better question.
Useful questions include:
Questions shift the burden away from you having to guess what the problem is.
You do not always need to explain the law yourself.
WAFA provides assistance animal information business cards that can be ordered free of charge.
These cards are designed as a practical self-advocacy resource that handlers can carry and hand to:
The cards provide a concise summary of the relevant legal framework and include a QR code linking to further information, including:
This can be particularly helpful if:
A simple response might be:
“WAFA has information explaining assistance animal access and the relevant law. You can scan the QR code on this card.”
or:
“This card has a summary and links to the legislation and further information.”
The card is a communication aid, not proof of your disability or proof of an animal’s legal status.
It should not be presented as though carrying a WAFA card is legally required.
Likewise, you are not required to hand one out every time someone asks a question.
It is simply another tool available to you.
The purpose of the WAFA card is to make communication easier.
It is not intended to be used as:
For example, you might say:
“There may be some confusion about assistance animal access. This card has a summary and links to the legislation if that helps.”
This is very different from:
“Here, read this because you’re breaking the law.”
The same information can be communicated in very different ways.
Choose the approach most likely to achieve your goal.
Asking for a manager does not need to sound hostile.
You might say:
“Could I please speak with a manager who can clarify this?”
or:
“I think this may need someone with authority to review it.”
or:
“Could you please ask a supervisor to come and speak with me?”
This can be useful when:
If useful, you can also offer the WAFA information card to the manager so they can review the information themselves.
Spoken communication may not always work well for you.
You may say:
“I need this information in writing.”
“Could you please email that to me?”
“I process written information better than verbal information.”
“Please write down what you are asking me to provide.”
“I would like to continue this discussion by email.”
Written communication can help because it:
You may need more time than another person expects.
Useful phrases include:
“I need a moment to process that.”
“Please give me some time before I answer.”
“I am having difficulty processing spoken information.”
“Can we pause while I read that?”
“I cannot respond to this immediately.”
“I need to review this before I make a decision.”
You are not required to produce an immediate answer simply because someone asks a question quickly.
Stress can change communication.
You may:
It can help to have a prepared message such as:
“I have a communication disability. I need written information and extra time.”
or:
“I am currently unable to communicate verbally. Please read this card.”
or:
“I need my support person to help me communicate.”
These can be stored:
You may also choose to hand the person a WAFA assistance animal information card rather than attempting to explain the legal framework while overwhelmed.
A personal communication card can be very simple.
For example:
I communicate differently when I am overwhelmed.
Please:
- speak slowly;
- ask one question at a time;
- give me time to respond;
- provide important information in writing;
- do not assume silence means agreement.
Another card might say:
This is my assistance animal.
I can provide relevant information about the animal if required.
Please do not ask me to discuss private medical information unless it is genuinely necessary.
A communication card should be:
A personal communication card and a WAFA information card serve different purposes.
Your personal card explains what you need.
The WAFA card provides general assistance animal information and links to further legal and practical resources.
You may carry both.
AAC can include:
If you use AAC, consider preparing common advocacy messages such as:
Having these available can reduce communication pressure.
You may need to protect your privacy or personal space.
Useful phrases include:
“I do not want to discuss my diagnosis.”
“That information is private.”
“I can explain the role of my assistance animal.”
“Please do not touch my animal.”
“Please step back.”
“I do not consent to being photographed.”
“Please direct questions to me.”
“I will ask my support person if I need help.”
“I am ending this conversation.”
A clear boundary is often more effective than a long explanation.
Sometimes an organisation offers a solution that technically sounds helpful but does not actually meet your needs.
You might say:
“Thank you, but that option does not meet my access needs.”
Then explain what you need instead.
For example:
“Waiting outside will not work for me. I need to remain with my assistance animal in the waiting area. Is there another space available?”
or:
“A phone call is not accessible for me. I need this communication by email.”
This keeps the focus on function.
Do not feel pressured to agree to something you do not understand.
You can ask:
“What does that mean in practice?”
“What happens if I agree to that?”
“Is this temporary or ongoing?”
“Who will have access to that information?”
“Can I have time to consider this?”
“Can you provide the request in writing?”
Understanding the request is part of informed decision-making.
Self-advocacy is often easier when planned.
Before a meeting, write down:
You do not need to remember everything.
Bring:
You can say:
“I have notes so I don’t forget anything important.”
or:
“I have an information card with links to the relevant assistance animal resources if that would be useful.”
That is entirely appropriate.
For planned meetings, you may request:
“Could you please send me an agenda beforehand?”
or:
“Could you tell me what questions will be discussed?”
or:
“Please provide any documents I need to review before the meeting.”
This allows you to prepare rather than being expected to process everything in real time.
If another person attends with you, decide their role beforehand.
They might:
You can tell the organisation:
“This person is here to support my communication. Please direct questions to me unless I ask them to respond.”
This preserves your control.
Sometimes a conversation becomes repetitive.
Rather than providing increasingly long explanations, calmly repeat the key point.
For example:
Staff member:
“Dogs aren’t allowed.”
You:
“This is my assistance animal. Could you please check the assistance animal policy?”
Staff member:
“But we don’t allow pets.”
You:
“I understand. This is my assistance animal. Could you please check the assistance animal policy?”
If useful, you can then add:
“I have a WAFA information card with a QR code to the relevant law and practical guidance if you’d like to look at it.”
This keeps you focused and reduces the risk of being drawn into irrelevant arguments.
Instead of:
“You are discriminating against me.”
you may initially say:
“I am concerned that this decision may not properly account for assistance animal access.”
Instead of:
“You clearly don’t know the law.”
you might say:
“I think there may be some confusion about the assistance animal requirements.”
You can then offer reliable information without making the interaction personal.
This is not about minimising serious discrimination.
It is about keeping communication focused on resolving the issue where possible.
Sometimes a softer approach does not work.
You may need to say:
“I do not agree with this decision.”
“I believe this issue needs formal review.”
“Please provide the refusal in writing.”
“I intend to make a complaint.”
“I would like the name and position of the person responsible for this decision.”
Assertive communication can become firmer without becoming abusive.
A useful self-advocacy email usually includes:
Brief factual description.
Explain the access or disability-related issue.
Be specific.
For example:
Attach or link only what is necessary.
You may include a link to relevant WAFA information or the source reached through the WAFA assistance animal card where this helps explain the issue.
Keep the tone:
I am writing regarding an access issue that occurred at your premises on [date].
I attended with my assistance animal and was advised that animals were not permitted.
I explained that the animal was an assistance animal but access remained refused.
I am requesting that the incident be reviewed and that you confirm your current assistance animal access policy.
I would also appreciate advice about what steps will be taken to prevent a similar situation occurring in future.
For reference, I have included a link to information about assistance animal access and the relevant legislative framework.
The exact wording should be adapted to your circumstances.
When something upsetting happens, you may want to include:
This can make the central issue harder to identify.
Before sending, ask:
“What does this person actually need to know to respond to my request?”
You can always provide more information later if needed.
Emails and written messages can be useful because they create a record of:
This becomes important if the issue later needs formal review.
Module 7 will explore documentation and evidence in more detail.
It may be tempting to post immediately about an access problem.
Sometimes public discussion is appropriate.
But before posting, consider:
A social media post and a formal complaint serve different purposes.
Choose deliberately.
You do not have to resolve everything in the moment.
After an incident, you may be able to communicate more effectively.
You might:
Sometimes later advocacy is stronger advocacy.
You may want to keep a small collection of phrases on your phone.
Possible headings include:
“This is my assistance animal.”
“Could you explain the reason for the refusal?”
“Could you please check the assistance animal policy?”
“I have a WAFA information card with a QR code to the relevant law and practical guidance if that would help.”
“What evidence do you require and why?”
“I do not want to discuss my diagnosis.”
“I need time to process that.”
“Please provide that in writing.”
“I would like to speak with a manager.”
“Please do not touch my assistance animal.”
“I am ending this conversation and will follow up in writing.”
“I need my support person contacted.”
These are tools, not rules.
By the end of this module, aim to have:
Store them somewhere accessible.
At the end of Module 6, remember:
Speech is not the only valid form of self-advocacy.
You can prepare communication tools before you need them.
Short, clear explanations are often more effective than giving your entire medical history.
Questions can be more useful than arguments.
You can ask for processing time.
You can request written communication.
You can communicate using AAC, cards, text or another method that works for you.
WAFA provides free assistance animal information cards that you can carry and hand to people when reliable information would help.
The WAFA cards summarise key information and provide a QR code to the Disability Discrimination Act, practical interpretation, community-language translations and additional resources.
The WAFA card is a communication resource, not legal proof of assistance animal status and not something you are legally required to carry.
You are allowed to set boundaries.
You can ask for a manager without becoming confrontational.
A support person can assist your communication without taking over your choices.
Written communication can both improve accessibility and create a useful record.
You do not have to resolve every problem immediately.
And most importantly:
Good communication tools reduce the pressure on you to explain everything yourself. Self-advocacy means having options: you can speak, write, use AAC, ask for support, hand someone reliable information, or continue the conversation later in the way that works best for you.